Hurricane specialist indicate that we are currently in a cycle that will cause more active hurricane seasons, possibly for decades to come.
In the past decade, the southeastern United States and the Caribbean basin have been pummeled by the most active hurricane cycle on record. Forecasters expect the stormy trend to continue for another 20 years or more.
Is it really wise to spend billions of dollars to rebuild below sea level? I'm not necessarily saying that New Orleans should be abandoned altogether, only the areas that lie below sea level. These area are always going to vulnerable to major flooding.
Hurricane specialist also suggest:
Since the 1970s, hurricanes have caused more property damage and casualties. Researchers disagree over whether this destructiveness is a consequence of the storms’ growing intensity or the population boom along vulnerable coastlines.If were rebuild the areas that are below sea level, we are just asking for trouble.
“The damage and casualties produced by more intense storms could increase considerably in the future,” Emanuel said.
3 comments:
No, it isn't wise.
Sadly, that may not matter much.
I would like to see a more creative approach to the problem than simply the bull-headed "rebuild it just like it was" but that, alas, does seem to be coming to fruition at the moment.
If people want to rebuild there that should be there prerogative, but I don't think you and I should have to pay for it. If my house was leveled by a tornado tomorrow (and some of my neighbors homes have been) the federal government won't rush in to build me a new house and it shouldn't N.O. residents either.
I suppose making that area into a "build at your own risk" zone might be an alternative.
Post a Comment