Via the BBC -
Paris Hilton must return to courtA Los Angeles judge has ordered Paris Hilton to appear in court on Friday morning to determine whether she should be returned to jail.
The celebrity heiress was allowed to leave jail on Thursday, only three days into a 45-day sentence for violating probation on a drink-driving ban.
She was given an electronic tag and ordered to remain under house arrest for the remainder of her sentence.
Her release on unspecified medical grounds sparked widespread criticism.
She is due in court at 0900 (1600GMT) on Friday, where Judge Michael Sauer, who sentenced her to jail at her trial in early May, will hear the case.
[. . .]
When Hilton was originally sentenced to 45 days for violating probation on a drink-driving conviction, she was told there was no prospect of early release.
Judge Sauer had also specifically ruled that she could not serve her sentence at home under electronic monitoring.
Even if she was suffering from some medical condition (most likely claustrophobia), I'm not sure why it should be a get out of jail free card. If so, is it a get out of jail free card for any poor schmuck who comes along? I have to agree with Al Sharpton on this one:
Civil rights leader Rev Al Sharpton condemned the release as showing the "double standards" of the US legal system.
"This early release gives all of the appearances of economic and racial favouritism that is constantly cited by poor people and people of colour," he said. "There are any number of cases of people who handle being incarcerated badly and even have health conditions that are not released."
I certainly hope the judge makes her do her full time in jail.
No comments:
Post a Comment